First-Order Default Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose a model theory for full first-order default logic that allows both closed and non-closed default theories. Beginning with first-order languages without logical equality, we note how Henkin’s proof of the completeness theorem for first-order logic yields complete algebras; that is, algebras over which models of consistent theories may always be found. The uniformity is what is interesting here. The algebra is constructed independently of the theory for which a model is sought and depends only on the underlying first-order language.. With these observations in place, the model theory for first-order defaults can be treated. Reiter [Rei80] has already told us what the extensions of closed first-order default theories are. With these extensions as a guide we introduce models, and extensions, of first-order default theories (D,W ) where these theories may be closed or non-closed. Beginning with closed default theories, the principal issue is how to check for consistency of the justifications in the defaults. A justification is consistent with a set of structures iff it is satisfied by some structure in the set. Let Γ be a set of structures. A Γ-model of (D,W ) is a set of structures over an algebra A which individually satisfy W and collectively satisfy D with respect to using Γ to check the consistency of the justifications. We describe these notions in detail in Section 5. The family of Γ-models of (D,W ) is closed under arbitrary union. Hence, over a given algebra A there is a unique largest Γ-model. Γ is a model of (D,W ) if Γ is the unique largest Γ-model of (D,W ). A maximal model of (D,W ) is a stable model of (D,W ) and the theory of a stable model, over a complete algebra, of (D,W ) is an extension of (D,W ). All complete algebras determine the same set of extensions. What about non-closed default theories? If one is going to assign values to freely occurring variables in default rules, we assume that one has a domain in mind where these values are to be found, i.e. an algebra A. One may then close (D,W ) with respect to A, fundamentally by adjoining the theory of A to W , and instantiating the freely occurring variables in the defaults in D, and
منابع مشابه
First-Order Default Logic Revisited
Reiter’s original proposal for default logic is unsatisfactory for open default theories because of Skolemization and grounding. In this paper, we reconsider this long-standing problem and propose a new world view semantics for firstorder default logic. Roughly speaking, a world view of a firstorder default theory is a maximal collection of structures satisfying the default theory where the def...
متن کاملDEFAULT QUANTIFIER LOGIC A canonical framework for monotonic reasoning with first-order default knowledge
In this paper we present a powerful uniform first-order framework for representing and reasoning with complex forms of default knowledge. This is achieved by extending first-order predicate logic with a new generalized quantifier, anchored in the quasi-probabilistic ranking measure paradigm [Weydert 94], which subsumes and refines the original, propositional notion of a default conditional [Del...
متن کاملAn Approach to Default Reasoning Based on a First-Order Conditional Logic
This paper presents an approach to default reasoning based on an extension to classical first-order logic. In this approach, first -order logic is augmented with a “variable conditional” operator for representing default statements. Truth in the resulting logic is based on a possible worlds semantics: the default statement C-P is true just when p is true in the least exceptional worlds in which...
متن کاملConstructing Markov Logic Networks from First-Order Default Rules
Expert knowledge can often be represented using default rules of the form “if A then typically B”. In a probabilistic framework, such default rules can be seen as constraints on what should be derivable by MAP-inference. We exploit this idea for constructing a Markov logic networkM from a set of first-order default rules D, such that MAP inference fromM exactly corresponds to default reasoning ...
متن کاملOrdering Default Theories
In first-order logic, a theory T1 is considered stronger than another theory T2 if every formula derived from T2 is also derived from T1. Such an order relation is useful to know relative value between different theories. In the context of default logic, a theory contains default information as well as definite information. To order default theories, it is necessary to assess the information co...
متن کاملTractable Markov Logic
Tractable subsets of first-order logic are a central topic in AI research. Several of these formalisms have been used as the basis for firstorder probabilistic languages. However, these are intractable, losing the original motivation. Here we propose the first non-trivially tractable first-order probabilistic language. It is a subset of Markov logic, and uses probabilistic class and part hierar...
متن کامل